Posts tagged renewable energy

A Look Inside The Finnish Cleantech Cluster
Sep 9th
Nina Harjula, National Development Manager, Finnish Cleantech Cluster, Lahti Science and Business Park Ltd, discusses, at the GCCA California Cleantech Collaboration, how the Cluster got started and the role it plays in promoting clean energy.
Global Cleantech Cluster Association Announces 185 Nominations For 2011 Later Stage Awards
Sep 5th
The Global Cleantech Cluster Association (GCCA), known as the global voice of cleantech, announced today 185 companies have been nominated for the 2011 GCCA Later Stage Award by 30 cleantech clusters from around the world. Nominations in 10 categories ranging from renewable energy and energy efficiency, to waste, water and green building were announced at the GCCA/EcoTech Quebec Cleantech for EcoCities Conference at EcoCity Montreal. Winners will be announced in Dublin on November 14th, hosted by the cleantech cluster An tSli Ghlas -The Green Way. Winning companies will receive international investment exposure and business support throughout 2012.
“We are thrilled to have such a strong list of nominated companies for the 2011 Later Stage Awards,” said Ben Taube, Chair of the GCCA. “Truly ground-breaking and innovative technologies are developed everyday across the world. We are pleased to highlight the very best and recognize them with partnership exposure among other benefits.”
Over next three months, the nominations will be judged on a variety of factors, from technology innovation and business strategy to their ability to execute. In addition to the 10 categories listed below, the three Most Impactful Technology awards will be given to companies that are improving the quality of life for people around the world, particularly in developing countries.
“With the Later Stage Awards we are moving the global cleantech needle forward,” said Shawn Lesser of Watershed Capital and co-founder of the GCCA. “Because of this type of global awareness, cleantech companies make it from localized markets into mainstream adoption.”
Of the 29 judges hand-selected for the Later Stage Award many are leading venture capital investors and entrepreneurs, including; Generationʼs Climate Solutions Fund (Al Goreʼs investment Firm), The Rockefeller Foundation, Dow Venture Capital, BASF Venture Capital and more.
“The list of judges is like a who’s who of cleantech investment. It’s a rare opportunity for these companies to introduce their technologies to nearly 30 investors all at once,” said Cal Hackeman, global leader for cleantech at Grant Thornton International, the top sponsor of the Later Stage Awards. “The GCCA’s Later Stage Award is a unique opportunity in the cleantech sector to showcase meaningful innovation and we are very proud to be a part of it.”
Nominations for the 10 Later Stage Award Categories
Advanced Materials
Agriculture
| IPUS | ECO WORLD STYRIA |
| Mercurius Biofuels | Chicago Clean Energy Alliance |
| Soy Works Corporation | Chicago Clean Energy Alliance |
| Synthezyme | NYC ACRE |
| TreeMetrics | An tSlí Ghlas – The Green Way |
Energy Efficiency
Green Buildings
Renewable Energy
Solar
| 7C solarparken | Flanders Cleantech Association |
| AE Polysilicon | Cleantech Alliance Mid-Atlantic |
| Amonix | CleanTech Los Angeles |
| Ampulse | Colorado Cleantech Industry Association |
| Astroenergy | CleanTech Korea |
| Day4 Energy Inc. | Greentech Exchange |
| Ducatt | Flanders Cleantech Association |
| Enfinity | Flanders Cleantech Association |
| eSolar | CleanTech Los Angeles |
| FemtoGrid | member (financial contributing) |
| ISET Inc | CleanTech Los Angeles |
| Linea Trovata | Flanders Cleantech Association |
| Morgan Solar | MaRS client |
| Novopolymers | Flanders Cleantech Association |
| Prism Solar Technologies | Clean Technology & Sustainable Industries Organization (CTSI) |
| Pure Solar Corp | Chicago Cluster |
| Semi-Materials | CleanTech Korea |
| Silicon Solar Solutions | Chicago |
| Solaris Synergy | Chicago Cluster |
| SolarNovar | Cleantech Center |
| Solarprint Ltd | The Green Way, Dublin |
| SolarReserve | CleanTech Los Angeles |
| SOLART | Ecotech Quebec |
| Sollega | NYC ACRE |
| S.O.L.I.D. | ECO WORLD STYRIA |
| Spectrolab, a Boeing Company | CleanTech Los Angeles |
| Sustainable Energy Technologies | MaRS client |
| Verengo Solar | CleanTech Los Angeles |
Transportation
| Achates Power | CleanTECH San Diego |
| Arcimoto | Chicago Clean Energy Alliance |
| Balqon Corporation | CleanTech Los Angeles |
| BlackGold Biofuels | Cleantech Alliance Mid-Atlantic |
| Bluways | Flanders Cleantech Association |
| Boulder Electric Vehicle | Colorado Cleantech Industry Association |
| Coda Automotive | CleanTech Los Angeles |
| EVPlugSite | The Clean Tech Center |
| Flyer | swisscleantech |
| Green Power Technologies | Cleantech Alliance Mid-Atlantic |
| Liberator.aero | An tSlí Ghlas – The Green Way |
| MCE 5 Development | French Cleantech |
| Minix | French Cleantech |
| Proterro | Cleantech Alliance Mid-Atlantic |
| Proviron | Flanders Cleantech Association |
| Rapid Electric Vehicles | GreenTech Exchange |
| SAM Group | swisscleantech |
| VanDyne SuperTurbo | Colorado Cleantech Industry Association |
| Ventech | Chicago Clean Energy Alliance |
| Weeels | NYC ACRE |
| Westport Innovations | GreenTech Exchange |
Waste
| Akkuser | Finnish Cleantech Cluster |
| Anellotech | NYC ACRE |
| Biothermica Technologies | Écotech Québec |
| Cross Wrap | Finnish Cleantech Cluster |
| ecoATM | CleanTECH San Diego |
| Glass Recycling Technologies | Cleantech Alliance Mid-Atlantic |
| Newalta Corporation | Écotech Québec |
| PMC Biotech | Cleantech Alliance Mid-Atlantic |
| PolyFlow | Akron Global Business Accelerator |
| Rediscovery Centre | An tSlí Ghlas – The Green Way |
| SOWATEC | ECO WORLD STYRIA |
| Synthetic Genomics | CleanTECH San Diego |
| Vadxx Energy | Akron Global Business Accelerator |
Water
| ABS Materials | Akron Global Business Accelerator |
| Aqua-Nu | Chicago Clean Energy Alliance |
| Clewer Marketing | Finnish Cleantech Cluster |
| Eole Water | French Cleantech |
| Flo-Matic | Chicago Clean Energy Alliance |
| FogBusters | Chicago Clean Energy Alliance |
| Liberty Hydro | Cleantech Alliance Mid-Atlantic |
| Magpie Polymers | French Cleantech |
| MAR Systems | Akron Global Business Accelerator |
| Midas Technologies | UK CEED |
| Paradigm Environmental | GreenTech Exchange |
| Portapure | Chicago Clean Energy Alliance |
| PremierTech Environmental Technologies Group | Écotech Québec |
| Rentricity | NYC ACRE |
| Saltworks Technologies | GreenTech Exchange |
| Smixin | swisscleantech |
| Trunz | swisscleantech |
| Water Canary | NYC ACRE |
Wind
| Acrosoma | Flanders Cleantech Association |
| C-FEC | ecoConnect |
| Endurance Wind Power | GreenTech Exchange |
| Luethi Enterprises | ecoConnect |
| Moventas | Finnish Cleantech Cluster |
| STEP | ECO WORLD STYRIA |
| Wind Products | NYC ACRE |
| Wysips | French Cleantech |
About the Global Cleantech Cluster Association
Global Cleantech is a non-profit association, headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, U.S. that creates conduits for companies to harness the tremendous benefits of international cleantech cluster collaboration in an efficient, affordable, and structured way. Global Cleantech provides a gateway for established and emerging cleantech companies to gain exposure to potential investors, new markets, influential networks, innovative technologies and best practices. GCCA was founded by Swisscleantech, the Finnish Cleantech Cluster, and Sustainable World Capital.
About Grant Thornton International
Grant Thornton International is one of the world’s leading organisations of independently owned and managed accounting and consulting firms providing assurance, tax and specialist advisory services to privately held businesses and public interest entities. Clients of member and correspondent firms can access the knowledge and experience of more than 2,500 partners in over 100 countries and receive the same distinctive, high quality and personalised service wherever they choose to do business. Grant Thornton International strives to speak out on issues that matter to business and which are in the wider public interest and to be a bold and positive leader in its chosen markets and within the global accounting profession.
Written by Shawn Lesser, Co-founder & Managing Partner of Atlanta-based Watershed Capital Group – an investment bank assisting sustainable fund and companies raise capital, perform acquisitions, and in other strategic financial decisions. He is also a Co-founder of the GCCA Global Cleantech Cluster Association ”The Global Voice of Cleantech”. He writes for various cleantech publications and is known as the David Letterman of Cleantech for his “Top 10″ series. He can be reached at shawn@watershedcapital.com
Details About The Army’s New Energy Initiatives Office Task Force
Sep 3rd
Assistant Secretary Katherine Hammack discusses the reasoning behind the development of the Army’s new Energy Initiatives Office Task Force.

The Nokia Siemens Approach To Building A Smarter Telecommunications Industry
Aug 29th
Seppo Yrjola, a member of the CTO Office of Nokia Siemens, discusses how his company is tackling smart grid challenges while attending the GCCA California Cleantech Collaboration, an event organized by Finnish Cleantech Cluster.

China steps up Solar Deployment
Aug 26th
On August 1, 2011, the China National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) announced a national feed-in tariff (FiT) for solar PV. Although details are still being released, the plan looks like a serious first step toward unleashing significant demand for solar PV in China.
Under the plan, utilities will pay solar energy producers 1.15 RMB/kWh (~US$.18/kWh) for projects that received NDRC approval before July 1 and are completed by the end of the year. It is estimated that there are 500-600MW of these approved projects already in the pipeline. Solar energy from projects approved after July 1 will receive 1 RMB/kWh (~US$ .15/kWh). These rates are significantly higher than tariffs in the last solar project bidding rounds in 2009 and 2010.
With a 1 RMB/kWh subsidy and steep declines in module prices, this subsidy will enable Chinese project developers to earn attractive, high single digit IRRs for projects in the Western provinces where sun resources are abundant. In the wealthier, less sunny Eastern provinces, the NDRC is encouraging provincial governments to supplement the national FiT with local and provincial deployment programs to improve the IRRs for projects there. Although it is too soon to know exactly how these policies could impact market size, early assessments indicate that this FiT could create a 2-3 GW Chinese market in 2012 and a 4-5GW market annually after that. This is a significant increase from the 10GW total, scheduled to be installed by 2015 under the 12th five-year plan announced in March.
Historically, announcement of national FiT programs spurs enormous growth in renewables. In the four years following the announcement of a national solar FiT in Germany and Italy, the solar market there grew by 95% and 194%, respectively. In the four years after China established a national FiT for wind, the wind market there doubled every year and now China is the largest wind power producer in the world. These policies work!
The tariffs will be paid out of the Renewable Energy Fund, which is funded by an assessment on all electricity consumers. There are no caps on the program, although the NDRC/NEA approval process and grid connection can act as a moderator to limit access to the tariff scheme.
Although a national FiT has been in the works for quite a while, this recent announcement confirms that China is looking for solar to play an increasingly important role in its renewable energy strategy. With over half of the world’s solar panels manufactured in China, it makes perfect sense for China to promote solar deployment, especially in the sun drenched Western and Southern provinces. With its spiraling demand for energy, China’s consumption of more solar can help further drive down prices and expand the global solar market, not to mention curbing carbon emissions from the world’s largest polluter.
China has a plan to capture the economic benefits of the new, clean energy economy with aggressive development programs for solar, high efficiency lighting, and new-fuel vehicles. This solar program is another piece of evidence that they are executing that plan.
And here in the US, what’s our plan?
Written by Cathy Boone. Cathy defines and articulates the voice of Applied Materials’ solar business, while advocating for the widespread adoption of solar PV around the world. As the senior director for solar and government relations, Cathy also ensures that Applied Materials and its technology, equipment and service products are recognized as providing the premier solar solutions.

Insight Into Appetite Of Finnish Clean Tech Investing
Aug 24th
Kari Herlevi, Senior Business Advisor for Tekes, discusses at the GCCA California Cleantech Collaboration, the current clean tech investing landscape in Finland and what types of companies are making strides to becoming global leaders in clean tech. The GCCA California Cleantech Collaboration was organized by Finnish Cleantech Cluster.
Top Ten United States Cleantech Accounting Firms 2011
Aug 15th
Accounting, auditing of financial statements and the host of services provided by accounting firms are extremely important to businesses, investors and stakeholders in the clean technology industry. Accounting firms assist in addressing a number of issues that are extremely relevant to the myriad clean technology companies, as well as advising on proper application of accounting standards, accessing governmental support and tax incentives, establishing effective systems of business processes and controls, executing merger and acquisition transactions and raising capital. They also audit the companies’ financial statements, assist with Federal, state, local and international tax compliance and provide outsourced internal audit services.In certain situations, accounting firms may act as corporate finance advisors in the raising of capital or securing debt for the company or individual cleantech projects.
Below is a list of the top ten accounting firms in the United States that are working with various renewable energy and other clean technology companies, from small entrepreneurial ventures to large, global businesses.
- KPMG, whose member firms provide audit, tax and advisory services to companies in more than 150 countries, takes a global view of Cleantech as a pivotal component of its Climate Change & Sustainability Services — a team with almost two decades of experience working in and around the emerging issues associated with energy and environmental sustainability. Leaders of the service include acknowledged experts in various sectors of Cleantech and sustainability from industry, government organizations, non-government organizations, and academia. KPMG’s superior work credentials include audit engagements with more than 50 Cleantech companies in the United States alone, including some of the largest names in the sector. KPMG provide tax and advisory services to solar and wind projects throughout the United States, including some of the world’s largest solar projects under construction in the United States. KPMG’s global reach includes representing successful bidders under Australia’s solar flagship program and providing assistance to companies in Germany, Spain, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. KPMG recently launched a Global Center of Excellence on Sustainability in Amsterdam to generate and coordinate Cleantech thought leadership and stimulate global discussion and awareness on key issues and topics not only for the firm and its clients, but also for the broader market. KPMG’s Global Energy Institute serves as a knowledge-sharing forum on a number of important topics.
- Ernst & Young is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services in more than 140 countries around the world. The firm is also the leader in serving fast growth companies around the globe and in serving VC-backed companies through its Strategic Growth Markets practice. For the 13th consecutive year, Ernst & Young was selected as one of Fortune Magazine’s “100 Best Companies to Work For.” Additionally, the firm is celebrating its long-time commitment to leading business innovators this year with the 25th anniversary of its Entrepreneur of the Year program, which has honored many cleantech trail blazers including the 2011 global winner, Olivia Lum, CEO of Singapore’s Hyflux. The firm’s Global Cleantech Center homepage, www.ey.com/cleantech, provides access to thought leadership and other resources from its network, including cleantech investment analyses, the firm’s Global Renewable Energy Attractiveness Indices and the firm’s 4th annual Global Cleantech Insights and Trends Report.
- Deloitte is the leader in serving clean tech companies. With its multidisciplinary experience in energy, technology, life sciences, manufacturing and consumer products, coupled with its deep understanding of the power and regulated utilities markets, Deloitte is well-positioned to help clean tech companies – solar energy, biofuels, batteries and fuel cells, energy efficiency, other renewables, and service and materials companies – across their entire life cycles and to grow and diversify their offerings. Leadership in Clean Tech also demands active participation across industry’s diverse community. The company’s commitment is demonstrated by its involvement in and support of a wide range of associations, conferences, and seminars, including Cleantech Group and Cleantech Open
- PricewaterhouseCoopers is one of the top accounting powerhouses around the globe with offices in more than 150 countries. This industry-focused accounting firm deals with performance improvement, transactions, human resources, tax, and audit fields, as well as crisis management assistance and stakeholder issues. In 2010, Fortune Magazine listed PricewaterhouseCoopers as one of the Best Companies to Work for in America. PricewaterhouseCoopers knows that innovation is extremely important, especially in the clean technology center, and helps them with growth strategies, obtain necessary resources, and fully manage their ROI.
- Grant Thornton International Ltd is a global accounting organization serving clean technology and energy companies around the globe. Their cleantech professionals possess deep industry understanding and business and financial knowledge. Through independently owned and managed accounting and consulting firms with more than 2,400 partners in over 100 countries they provide assurance, tax and specialist advisory services to privately held businesses, publicly held companies and public interest entities in this dynamic and growing sector of the global economy. Services offered to cleantech companies, in addition to the traditional audits of financial statements, international, federal, state and local tax planning and compliance and business advisory, also include a full range of accounting, internal audit, merger and acquisition structuring and due diligence, governance risk and compliance, SOX readiness, IT and business processes, compensation and employee benefits, valuation, corporate finance and economic and business advisory. Grant Thornton member firms and their over 30,000 professionals provide the experience, expertise and trust need to grow and succeed in the world of clean technology including accessing the public capital markets through initial and follow-on public offerings of stock and debt.The Grant Thornton International Cleantech Steering Committee coordinates their global focus on serving the cleantech industry and includes member firm partners from leading and emerging economies. Grant Thornton is the global accounting firm sponsor of the Global Cleantech Cluster Association’s (GCCA) 2011 Later Stage Cleantech Company Awards.
- BDO USA, LLP is the U.S. member firm, the world’s fifth largest international accounting and consulting network. BDO USA provides assurance, tax, financial advisory and consulting services to a wide range of publicly traded and privately held companies. The firm has deep roots in both the technology and natural resources industries, and oversees cleantech engagements in the U.S. and abroad through the global BDO network. Through dedicated Cleantech and Alternative Energy practices, BDO leverages extensive industry knowledge and technical experience to help companies navigate tax credit incentives, SEC comments on climate change, IPO readiness, sustainability reporting, value-added alternative energy tax strategies (including a focus on green energy tax), obtaining LEED certification, FCPA compliance, IFRS consulting, and navigation of joint interest audits.
- Reznick Group is a top 20 national CPA firm with 10 offices nationwide and over 1,000 professionals. Reznick Group focuses on renewable energy and offers a broad array of accounting, tax and business advisory services specific to this industry. With services tailored to investors, infrastructure developers and producers of renewable energy power, clients include independent power producers, energy project developers, entrepreneurial companies, financial institutions, utilities, governments and municipalities, technology firms and mid cap to large cap companies. Since the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 created many new financial incentives for the renewable energy industry, Reznick Group has helped clients leverage those and other incentives, like Section 1603 grants. While guiding clients through the renewable energy regulations that are in place, Reznick Group also provides clients with the industry insights and financial advice needed to move ideas, and business, ahead.
- RSM McGladrey has over one-hundred offices throughout the United States and is a leading firm offering wealth management, tax and business consulting, retirement resources, international business services, and investment banking. In 2008, RSM McGladrey partnered with CTEK Denver Ventures and created a new facility to foster and support regional entrepreneurship and innovation using capital resources, advisor network, community venture centers, and technology transfer. The incubators formed by the venture, known as CTEK Stapleton will focus on clean technology and biotechnology.
- CBIZ is one of the leading national providers of a number of accounting services, including attest and assurance, compliance, accounting and tax, internal audit, information security, business valuation, budgeting and forecasting, mergers and acquisitions, strategic planning consulting, and benefits and insurance. The goal of CBIZ is to provide the clean technology industry with the assistance they need to achieve all business objectives.
- Crowe Horwath LLP is one of the largest national public accounting and consulting firms. This firm offers a number of services, including tax, audit, advisory, performance, and risk. Crowe Horwath LLP has a number of clean technology industry specialists. They are able to provide deep insight and a comprehensive understanding. This offers maximum opportunity for complete success when it comes to achieving all business goals and elevating their competitive advantage.
Written by Shawn Lesser, Co-founder & Managing Partner of Atlanta-based Watershed Capital Group – an investment bank assisting sustainable fund and companies raise capital, perform acquisitions, and in other strategic financial decisions. He is also a Co-founder of the GCCA Global Cleantech Cluster Association ”The Global Voice of Cleantech”. He writes for various cleantech publications and is known as the David Letterman of Cleantech for his “Top 10″ series. He can be reached at shawn@watershedcapital.com
Already a champion when it comes to job growth – how is solar keeping up with basic training?
Aug 15th
Solar projects are getting a lot of attention in the United States these days, and rightfully so. Gasoline costs have doubled since 2001, leaving us concerned to which extend other forms of energy will follow suit. Couple this with the consequences resulting from the nuclear tragedy in Japan and it is no wonder that we are exploring alternative forms of energy at a faster pace than ever before.
To get started the United States has been drawing inspiration and knowledge from our European counterparts. In the old world people recognized the benefits of solar early on. Germany, still the world leader in solar deployment, decided to enter into an aggressive campaign to expand its energy portfolio to include solar as well as other forms of renewable energy.
So, how do we ensure that we can not only mirror this success in the US, but indeed claim the title of ‘world’s largest solar market’ – as predicted – within the next three years or so? There are many components that factor into achieving this goal. The most basic of them all is education, namely on the part of the general public as well as the newly forming solar industry as well. When it comes to the industry, training and certification are absolutely vital. The industry is composing itself of a variety of individuals whose backgrounds include: construction, roofing, general contractors, electricians – the list goes on. We must ensure that these individuals are equipped with the level of knowledge and understanding necessary to guarantee a successful solar experience for the customer, the utility and the industry as a whole. Potential solar customers must also be educated in what to look for when selecting an integrator.
It all begins with training. A good solar integrator must have a significant depth of knowledge in a myriad of subjects:
- Construction – To ensure a safe and structurally sound install.
- Electrical – Safe and efficient wiring of the modules and other electrical components is absolutely crucial.
- Site Analysis – To be able to determine the perfect location for the customers to maximize – without any compromise – their solar experience.
- Financials – Working with the home/business owner to determine power need, return on investment and to secure federal, state and local grants and incentives.
For smaller companies, this may be a handful of key individuals that handle multiple aspects. Larger companies often take a more compartmentalized approach. No matter how the approach – training is readily available and should become a basic requirement. It is also a prerequisite to the obtaining of industry certification which validates the individual’s knowledge in these subjects, and aids people in selecting the right installer for their solar system.
Multiple entities offer various forms of certification for solar professionals: NABCEP (North American Board of Certified Energy Practitioners), ETA (Electronics Technicians Association) and UL (Underwriters Laboratory). Of these, NABCEP is seen as the industry leader, with a large number of states and other entities offering incentives and grants only if work is performed by a NABCEP certified installer.
NABCEP’s certification process for installers encompasses training in safety and electrical, is tied heavily to NEC code requirements and requires documented installations prior to allowing candidates to even sit for the PV Installer Certification Exam. In addition to the classroom time and hands-on, independent study is a must.
The same is true of NABCEP’s Technical Sales Certification. Individuals that obtain this certification require a comprehensive understanding of site analysis, system design, system financials and are expected to do this with a high degree of accuracy and ethics.
As solar industry grows and develops in the United States, we will begin to see more and more states embracing this certification, not only in regard to obtaining grants and incentives, but also with respect to licensing for those who are installing and designing solar. For customers, locating a certified installer is the best starting point; couple this with references from previous installs and it will ensure a great experience for all concerned.
Written by Sylvia Minton, who heads the Public Affairs Chair of the Georgia Solar Energy Association. A long time journalist and communications specialist, the Sr. VP of Corporate Affairs for MAGE SOLAR, a complete solar PV systems provider, is a member of the board of directors of the MAGE SOLAR ACADEMY in Dublin, GA, USA.
Renewable policies crushing New England’s economy
Aug 15th
Earlier this summer, the New England Energy Alliance in Boston, released the results of its annual survey of New England energy consumers. Paul Afonso, executive director of the Alliance and a former Massachusetts utility regulator, summed the results up this way: “Overall, the main concern of New Englanders continues to be the economy and pocketbook issues. If voters think any policy – private or public – will bring down the cost of energy, they will support it.”
If that’s the case, than the survey’s findings reflect a sentiment that’s entirely contrary to New England’s current energy policies.
Background
The six New England states have aggressively pushed for renewable energy development in the Northeast, with particular emphasis on wind power. Five of the states, Vermont excluded, have adopted Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) mandating that a percentage of the electricity sold retail into the region comes from renewables.
RPS obligations for 2010 were about 14% of demand — an amount satisfied through a combination of existing, qualified resources in New England and renewable energy imported from neighboring New York and Canada. However, these percentages are slated to reach over 20% by 2020 with most of the energy coming from projects not yet built. Meeting the growing renewable obligation with new generation will be substantially more difficult. Critical adjustments in RPS policies are needed now or skyrocketing energy costs will severely cripple New England’s economy.
Wind in New England: Today and in 2020
New England currently claims 48 wind energy projects totaling 318 megawatts. Maine has the most wind installed at 266 megawatts; Connecticut the least at 0.1 megawatts. Assuming a generous 30% annual capacity factor, wind in New England produced around 836,000 megawatts hours (MWh) in 2010, substantially below other fuel options including natural gas which produced over 50 million MWh (half the region’s demand).
New England would need to add 23 million MWhs of new renewable energy in order to satisfy state mandates by 2020. Since wind energy is the primary resource proposed to be built in the region, and the resource most favored by New England’s ‘ruling class’, future RPS obligations will likely be met by in-region wind power.
But what will this look like?
Meeting 2020 obligations dictated by state laws will require a 28-fold increase (9000 megawatts) in wind energy over the amount installed today. Measured in actual turbines, nearly 3000 3-megawatt turbines would be needed by 2020 or 300 new turbines erected every year for the next 9-10 years.
Nearly every wind project proposed in New England has encountered substantial opposition. Historically, opponents argue citing local concerns including the impact of the turbines on the natural environment and properties in proximity to the towers. Local opposition will certainly intensify; but wind development on the scale necessary to meet RPS mandates will also trigger region-wide fights with complaints expanding to such topics as the cost and impact on New England’s economy.
Getting to 20% wind in New England
In December 2010, the ISO-New England [1] released the findings of its New England Wind Integration Study (NEWIS). The study, conducted by General Electric, assessed the operational effects of integrating large amounts of intermittent wind power into the ISO’s control area. The NEWIS study concluded that significant wind resources could be added to New England’s power grid but for a price.
It was the price of this integration that caught our attention.
- Existing Power Plants :
Despite adding thousands of megawatts of new wind to the grid, the NEWIS study assumed the existing fleet of New England’s power plants would remain with no significant plant retirements relative to capacity resources. The study also assumed that new capacity resources proposed to be built would be brought online and the grid’s regulation capacity requirement would grow to 313 MW, nearly 4-times the current level.
Twenty-percent wind in New England would not result in the decommissioning of existing capacity nor would it negate the need to build new generation. While wind might displace fossil fuel, primarily natural gas, it cannot replace it.
- Transmission :
Since many favorable sites for wind development are remote from New England’s load centers, development of these distant sites would require significant transmission development. According to NEWIS, 20% wind in New England would require 4,095 miles of new lines at an estimated cost of between $11 and $15 billion dollars. [2]
This cost would be in addition to the $5 billion already approved in New England to address existing reliability requirements. None of the wind-related transmission has been proposed to date nor has any public discussion been initiated on who would pick up the tab. The survey cited above found that New Englanders disliked high-voltage transmission lines even more than wind turbines.
- Energy Costs :
The NEWIS report is mainly silent on the effect of large-scale wind integration on energy prices, but it does acknowledge two important points.
- A wind plant’s revenue may be below its annual total cost which could require the plant owner to secure higher than market value power purchase agreement(s);
- By displacing conventional generation, primarily natural-gas-fired resources, revenues for displaced plants would decrease and their economic viability would be put at risk. Increases in capacity market payments may be necessary to ensure these plants do not shut down.
Adding large amounts of wind to the region may reduce marginal electricity prices since wind has no fuel cost, but the costs passed on to ratepayers are derived from power purchase agreements negotiated between utilities and wind plant owners. Onshore wind currently demands between 9-11 cents per KWh, more than twice the wholesale price of natural gas. Offshore wind is even more expensive at over 18 cents a KWh. More wind in the fuel mix will cause upward pressure on energy prices for the life of the power purchase agreements. As these agreements expire in 15-20 years, prices may drop but by that time the turbines will be coming to the end of their operating life.
Other significant integration costs will also be imposed on the region to accommodate wind’s intermittency, including billions in new transmission.
- Measuring Benefit :
According to the NEWIS study, 20% penetration of wind in New England will reduce yearly CO2 emissions by 12 million tons per year, a 25% decline. This percentage is significant but placing a value on the savings paints a very different picture.
Currently, RGGI carbon allowances are trading at the reserve price of $1.89, which would place the value of the benefit at $22.7 million per year — a fraction of the transmission costs alone, even if paid out every year for 20 years, which is the life of the wind plants. In fact, just to break even on the $15 billion in new transmission costs, the price of carbon would need to be over $60/ton. Clearly, there are less costly and more appropriate methods of reducing carbon emissions.
Conclusion
We do not object to the findings of the NEWIS report that large quantities of wind can be injected into the region. As an academic analysis, the report is reasonable. However, the requirements necessary to meet a 20% wind scenario in New England are wholly unrealistic. Each state can try and overrule local opposition to individual wind projects and fast-track approvals under the pretext of ‘public benefit’, but the effect of above-market power purchase agreements, high-priced transmission construction, and other related integration costs will crush the region’s economy.
Unless changes are made to current RPS policies, New England is headed for an energy crisis of its own making. But who will press for change? Those making energy policy decisions are driven by ideology and appear unaware of the pending costs. And those likely to benefit financially from the policies, including big utilities wanting to build big transmission, are happy to play along. Unfortunately for New England’s energy consumers, no one is watching out for their interests.
[1] The ISO-NE is a non-profit entity tasked with managing the New England grid system and ensuring the day-to-day reliable operation of the region’s bulk power generation and transmission.
[2] Figures from the ISO-NE Governors’ Economic Study referenced in the NEWIS report.
Written by Lisa Linowes, Executive Director of the Industrial Wind Action Group. The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author, Lisa Linowes.

US Dept of Commerce: Clean Tech Exports Is A Job Adder
Aug 2nd
Francisco Sanchez, Department of Commerce Under Secretary, discusses how much emphasis is being placed on exporting clean tech solutions.





Recent Comments